![]() Rather than merely asking a set of conventional poll questions, she and her team engaged in a series of in-depth interviews with a representative sample of the American population.Īs I read the study, two things stood out to me. In 2020 the Notre Dame sociologist Tricia Bruce released a fascinating and highly original study of American attitudes about abortion. But the historical record does tell us that ending abortion is a different matter from banning abortion, and we cannot end abortion until we learn why women seek abortions and how our nation can address the concerns that lead them to make that choice. As a matter of deep principle, we cannot leave any human being unprotected by law-and the life and health of the mother are as paramount as those of the child. This decrease doesn’t mean that pro-life Americans should cease working to provide legal protections for unborn life. ![]() According to data from the pro-abortion-rights Guttmacher Institute, the abortion rate was at about 16 abortions per 1,000 women when Roe was decided in 1973, soared to 29.3 abortions per 1,000 women by the end of the Carter administration in 1981, and then began a long, slow, and steady decline to an all-time low of 13.5 abortions per 1,000 women in 2017. The history of abortion in the United States is contentious and complicated, but a single fact should shape much of the debate in the months and years to come: Abortion was more common when it was mostly illegal. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the movement can ultimately defeat its very purpose.įrom the December 2019 issue: The dishonesty of the abortion debate Indeed, if it reacts with too heavy a hand in the aftermath of Dobbs v. ![]() But the movement should also show a profound humility and absence of malice toward their political opponents.Īfter all, the simple truth is that if the pro-life movement wants to end abortion, it has to do much more work than merely banning abortion. The people of this country have, for the first time in almost 50 years, an opportunity to enact laws that truly protect the lives of unborn children. The pro-life movement should greet the reversal of Roe v. Justice is thus necessary but not sufficient for a culture of life. The entire legal and cultural ethos of the pro-life movement can be summed up in two sentences: A just society protects all life.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |